4.5 Article

Recent large-scale range expansion and outbreaks of the common vole (Microtus arvalis) in NW Spain

期刊

BASIC AND APPLIED ECOLOGY
卷 14, 期 5, 页码 432-441

出版社

ELSEVIER GMBH
DOI: 10.1016/j.baae.2013.04.006

关键词

Rodents; Agriculture; Cycles; Rodenticides; Tularaemia; Castilla y Leon; Iberian Peninsula

类别

资金

  1. ECOCYCLES [BIODIVERSA 2008, EUI2008-03658]
  2. NERC [NE/G002045/1]
  3. Leverhulme research fellowship
  4. NERC [NE/G002045/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  5. Natural Environment Research Council [NE/G002045/1] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Irruptive populations of rodents cause damage to agriculture worldwide. By the end of the last century, the distribution range of Microtus arvalis in NW Spain greatly expanded to encompass agricultural habitats, with the appearance of crop damaging population outbreaks. The absence of long term vole monitoring data has so far precluded outbreak forecasting, which might help mitigating associated bioeconomic costs. We used non-standard and diverse sources of information, including newspaper and national technical reports, to describe the vole expansion and outbreak dynamics in NW Spain since the late 1960s. We illustrate a rapid (<20 years) and large scale (ca. 5 million ha) colonisation of agricultural lowlands, and suggest a pattern of westward expansion emanating from the peripheral mountains. Crop damaging outbreaks directly followed range expansion and our analyses indicate that they have occurred at approximately 5-year intervals since the early 1980s. This is the first description of long term (>40 years) regional scale vole dynamics reported for the Iberian Peninsula. We suggest that expansion from (humid) mountains to (dry) plains may be related to recent changes in land use. If confirmed at a local scale, the apparent cyclicity of outbreaks would provide a basis for forecasting outbreak risk in NW Spain and may help managers adjust current control strategies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据