4.6 Article

Differential regulation of the dopamine D2 and D3 receptors by G protein-coupled receptor kinases and β-arrestins

期刊

JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 276, 期 40, 页码 37409-37414

出版社

AMER SOC BIOCHEMISTRY MOLECULAR BIOLOGY INC
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M106728200

关键词

-

资金

  1. NHLBI NIH HHS [HL 61365] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NINDS NIH HHS [NS 19576] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The D-2 and D-3 receptors (D2R and D3R), which are potential targets for antipsychotic drugs, have a similar structural architecture and signaling pathway. Furthermore, in some brain regions they are expressed in the same cells, suggesting that differences between the two receptors might lie in other properties such as their regulation. In this study we investigated, using COS-7 and HEK-293 cells, the mechanism underlying the intracellular trafficking of the D2R and D3R. Activation of D2R caused G protein-coupled receptor kinase-dependent receptor phosphorylation, a robust translocation of beta -arrestin to the cell membrane, and profound receptor internalization. The internalization of the D2R was dynamin-dependent, suggesting that a clathrin-coated endocytic pathway is involved. In addition, the D2R, upon agonist-mediated internalization, localized to intracellular compartments distinct from those utilized by the B-2-adrenergic receptor. However, in the case of the D3R, only subtle agonist-mediated receptor phosphorylation, beta -arrestin translocation to the plasma membrane, and receptor internalization were observed. Interchange of the second and third intracellular loops of the D2R and D3R reversed their phenotypes, implicating these regions in the regulatory properties of the two receptors. Our studies thus indicate that functional distinctions between the D2R and D3R may be found in their desensitization and cellular trafficking properties. The differences in their regulatory properties suggest that they have distinct physiological roles in the brain.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据