4.7 Article

VLBI study of water maser emission in the Seyfert 2 galaxy NGC 5793. I. Imaging blueshifted emission and the parsec-scale jet

期刊

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
卷 560, 期 1, 页码 119-126

出版社

UNIV CHICAGO PRESS
DOI: 10.1086/322416

关键词

galaxies : individual (NGC 5793); galaxies : jets; galaxies : Seyfert; masers; radio continuum : galaxies; techniques : high angular resolution

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We present the first result of VLBI observations of the blueshifted water maser emission from the type 2 Seyfert galaxy NGC 5793, which we combine with new and previous VLBI observations of continuum emission at 1.7, 5.0, 8.4, 15, and 22 GHz. Maser emission was detected earlier in single-dish observations and found to have both red- and blueshifted features relative to the systemic velocity. We could image only the blueshifted emission, which is located 3.6 pc southwest of the 22 GHz continuum peak. The blueshifted emission was found to originate in two clusters that are separated by 0.7 mas (0.16 pc). No compact continuum emission was found within 3.6 pc of the maser spot. A compact continuum source showing a marginally inverted spectrum between 1.7 and 5.0 GHz was found 4.2 pc southwest of the maser position. The spectral turnover might be due to synchrotron self-absorption caused by a shock in the jet owing to collision with dense gas, or it might be due to free-free absorption in an ionized screen, possibly the inner part of a disk, foreground to the jet. The water maser may be part of a maser disk. If so, it would be rotating in the opposite sense to the highly inclined galactic disk observed in CO emission. We estimate a binding mass within 1 pc of the presumed nucleus to be on the order of 10(7) M-.. Alternatively, the maser emission could result from the amplification of a radio jet by foreground circumnuclear molecular gas. In this case, the high blueshift of the maser emission might mean that the masing region is moving outward away from the molecular gas surrounding an active nucleus.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据