4.5 Article

Influence of abiotic factors on spider and ground beetle communities in different salt-marsh systems

期刊

BASIC AND APPLIED ECOLOGY
卷 9, 期 6, 页码 743-751

出版社

ELSEVIER GMBH
DOI: 10.1016/j.baae.2007.08.007

关键词

Arancae; Carabidae; Halophilic species; Tidal ecosystems; Monitoring; Salinity; Flooding; Conservation

类别

资金

  1. Institut Francais de la Biodiversite
  2. CNRS Zone Atelier

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Salt marshes are interesting and endangered ecosystems in West-Europe. Nevertheless, their arthropod fauna remains largely unknown and the factors determining assemblages at micro-habitat scale are poorly understood. Few data are also available about the effects of management measures in salt marshes and how to monitor them. The aim of the present study is to determine the major factors structuring two dominant communities of arthropods, spider and ground beetles, in natural, managed (cutting and sheep grazing) and invaded (by the grass Elymus athericus) salt marshes. The two taxa were studied during 2002 and 2003 in different salt marshes of the Mont Saint-Michel Bay (NW France) by pitfall traps and hand-collecting. A total of 12350 spiders (57 species) and 16355 ground beetles (35 species) were caught during the study and analysed with respect to effects of the salinity gradient and of habitat structure characteristics. Spiders and ground beetles reacted differently to environmental factors in salt marshes. Spiders could more easily cope with salinity and their presence/absence was less related to the salinity than that of ground beetles. For ground beetles, there were few other community-structuring environmental factors and these were only related the edaphic environment: species restricted to open habitats, significant effects of moisture content and salinity revealed by CCA. Because they are likely to bring complementary information on abiotic factors, we finally suggest using both spiders and ground beetles for monitoring the effects of management practices in salt marshes. (c) 2007 Gesellschaft fur Okologie. Published by Elsevier GmbH. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据