4.5 Article

The role of biomass allocation strategy in diversity loss due to fertilization

期刊

BASIC AND APPLIED ECOLOGY
卷 9, 期 5, 页码 485-493

出版社

ELSEVIER GMBH
DOI: 10.1016/j.baae.2007.06.015

关键词

individual biomass; reproductive allocation; functional trait; species relative abundance; interspecific competition; alpine meadow; Tibetan Plateau

类别

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [90 202 009]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Proposed mechanisms for explaining biodiversity loss due to fertilization include interspecific competition and assemblage-level thinning. The interspecific competition hypothesis (ICH) assumes a link between population changes and species competitive ability, which is related to functional traits such as biomass allocation patterns. Based on a 2-year fertilization experiment in an alpine meadow on the Tibetan Plateau, we attempted to explore the relationships between individual and population responses. Individual response was Measured by changes In plant biomass and biomass allocation, and population response was estimated by changes in species abundance. The results Suggested that following fertilization (1) changes in individual biomass differ among species and functional groups, (2) reproductive allocation tends to decrease for all species whereas leaf allocation generally increases for grasses but decreases for forbs, (3) a strong positive correlation exists between species relative abundance change and individual biomass response, and (4) species relative abundance change has a positive correlation with leaf allocation response, a negative correlation with stern allocation response, and no significant correlation with reproductive allocation response. We Conclude that the individual biomass responses and biomass allocation strategy can partly explain diversity loss due to fertilization, a result consistent with the ICH. (C) 2007 Gesellschaft fur Okologie. Published by Elsevier GmbH. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据