4.6 Article

Chromatographic methods for product-profile analysis and isolation of oligosaccharides produced by heparinase-catalyzed depolymerization of heparin

期刊

JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY A
卷 932, 期 1-2, 页码 65-74

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/S0021-9673(01)01241-9

关键词

heparin; oligosaccharides; histamine; carbohydrates

资金

  1. NHLBI NIH HHS [HL56588] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A two-dimensional chromatography method for monitoring the formation of oligosaccharides produced by heparinase-catalyzed depolymerization of heparin is reported. In the first step of the two-dimensional method, the depolymerized heparin is size-fractionated by high-performance get permeation chromatography (HPGPC). The size-uniform fractions are then separated on the basis of charge by strong anion-exchange (SAX) HPLC on a high resolution CarboPac PA1 column. To demonstrate application of the two-dimensional product-profile analysis method, data are presented for the heparinase I-catalyzed depolymerization of heparin in the absence and presence of histamine, a ligand that binds site-specifically to heparin. Results from the two-dimensional analysis indicate that histamine alters the extent of depolymerization and the product-profiles for the tetrasaccharide and hexasaccharide fractions. The use of CarboPac PAI columns for the semipreparative scale separation of oligosaccharides in size-uniform fractions isolated from depolymerized heparin by low-pressure (gravity flow) GPC is also reported. The semi-preparative scale CarboPac PAI column gives high resolution and excellent reproducibility after repeated use over an extended period of time, making it possible to reliably combine fractions from multiple separations. The oligosaccharides are eluted from the CarboPac PA I column with a NaCl gradient at relatively low pH (3 or 7) where they are stable. An efficient two-step procedure is described for desalting oligosaccharides separated by SAX-HPLC. (C) 2001 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据