4.6 Article

Beneficial effects of targeting CCR5 in allograft recipients

期刊

TRANSPLANTATION
卷 72, 期 7, 页码 1199-1205

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/00007890-200110150-00003

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIAID NIH HHS [P01 AI40152] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background. The chemokine receptor, CCR5, and its three high-affinity ligands, macrophage inflammatory protein- (MIP) 1 alpha, MIP-1 beta, and regulated on activation normal T cell expressed and secreted (RANTES), are expressed by infiltrating mononuclear cells during the rejection of clinical and experimental organ allo grafts, although the significance of these molecules in the pathogenesis of rejection has not been established Methods. We studied intragraft events in four allo graft models. First, we studied cardiac transplants in fully MHC-mismatched mice that were deficient in CCR5 or two of its ligands, MIP-1 alpha or RANTES. Second we tested the effects of a neutralizing rat anti-mCCR5 monoclonal antibody on allograft survival. Third we assessed whether a subtherapeutic course of cyclosporine would potentiate enhance survival in CCR5 deficient recipients. Finally, we tested the effect of targeting CCR5 in a class II-mismatched model. Results. Whereas mice deficient in expression of MIP-1 alpha or RANTES reject fully MHC-mismatched cardiac allografts normally, CCR5-/- mice, or CCR5+/+ mice treated with a neutralizing mAb to mCCR5, show enhanced allograft survival. MHC class II-disparate mismatched are permanently accepted in CCR5-/- but not CCR5+/+ recipients. Finally, the beneficial effect of targeting of CCR5 are markedly synergistic with the effects of cyclosporine, resulting in permanent engraftment without development of chronic rejection. Conclusions. We conclude that CCR5 plays a key role in the mechanisms of host T cell and macrophage recruitment and allograft rejection, such that targeting of CCR5 clinically may be of therapeutic significance.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据