4.7 Article

Tactile prepuff inhibition of startle in children with Tourette's syndrome: In search of an fMRI-friendly startle paradigm

期刊

BIOLOGICAL PSYCHIATRY
卷 50, 期 8, 页码 578-585

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/S0006-3223(01)01164-7

关键词

functional magnetic resonance imaging; prepulse inhibition; sensorimotor gating; startle; Tourette's syndrome

资金

  1. NIMH NIH HHS [MH42228, MH01436] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) studies in neuropsychiatric populations will be enhanced by on-line tasks that assess brain activation linked to neurocognitive and psychophysiological functions. In some cases, task modifications may be required for use in an fMRI environment. Prepulse inhibition (PPI) of the startle reflex is an operational measure of sensorimotor gating that is deficient in specific neuropsychiatric disorders, including schizophrenia, Huntington's disease, and Tourette's syndrome (TS). This study examined whether a modified fMRI-friendly PPI paradigm is suitable for use in children and adequately sensitive to detect PPI deficits in TS. Methods: Bilateral eyeblink PPI was measured in children using chin air puffs to elicit startle and prepuffs to the dorsal hand surface as inhibiting stimuli. This paradigm involved no metallic objects or acoustic stimuli, making it suitable for an fMRI environment that is magnetically sensitive and acoustically complex. Children were also assessed in a standard acoustic PPI paradigm. Results: Robust startle was elicited via either puffs or noise bursts, and these responses were inhibited by prepuffs and prepulses, respectively. Compared to control subjects, children with TS exhibited comparable startle magnitude and habituation but significantly reduced prepuff inhibition and acoustic PPI. Conclusions: Sensorimotor gating can be assessed in an fMRI-friendly paradigm that detects inhibitory deficits (C) 2001 Society of Biological Psychiatry.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据