4.6 Article

The effect of systemic hypoxia on interstitial and blood adenosine, AMP, ADP and ATP in dog skeletal muscle

期刊

JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-LONDON
卷 536, 期 2, 页码 593-603

出版社

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-7793.2001.0593c.xd

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

1. We investigated the effect of moderate systemic hypoxia on the arterial, venous and interstital concentration of adenosine and adenine nucleotides in the neurally and vascularly isolated, constant-flow perfused gracilis muscles of anaesthetized dogs. 2. Systemic hypoxia reduced arterial Po-2 from 129 to 28 mmHg, venous Po-2 from 63 to 23 mmHg, arterial pH from 7.43 to 7.36 and venous pH from 7.38 to 7.32. Neither arterial nor venous Pco(2) were changed. Arterial perfusion pressure remained at 109 +/- 8 mmHg for the first 5 min of hypoxia, then increased to 131 +/- 11 mmHg by 9 min, and then decreased again throughout the rest of the hypoxic period. 3. Arterial adenosine (427 +/- 98 nm) did not change during hypoxia, but venous adenosine increased from 360 +/- 52 to 518 +/- 107 nM. Interstitial adenosine concentration did not increase (339 +/- 154 nil in normoxia and 262 +/- 97 nM in hypoxia). Neither arterial nor venous nor I P interstitial concentrations of adenine nucleotides changed significantly in hypoxia. 4. Interstitial adenosine, AMP, ADP and ATP increased from 194 +/- 40, 351 +/- 19, 52 +/- 7 and 113 +/- 36 to 764 +/- 140, 793 +/- 119, 403 +/- 67 and 574 +/- 122 nili, respectively, during 2 Hz muscle contractions. 5. Adenosine, AMP, ADP and ATP infused into the arterial blood did not elevate the interstitial concentration until the arterial concentration exceeded 10 mum. 6. We conclude that the increased adenosine in skeletal muscle during systemic hypoxia is formed by the vascular tissue or the blood cells, and that adenosine is formed intracellularly by these tissues. On the other band, adenosine formation takes place extracellularly in the interstitial space during muscle contractions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据