3.8 Article

Rotating night shifts and risk of breast cancer in women participating in the nurses' health study

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE
卷 93, 期 20, 页码 1563-1568

出版社

NATL CANCER INSTITUTE
DOI: 10.1093/jnci/93.20.1563

关键词

-

类别

资金

  1. NCI NIH HHS [CA87969] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIEHS NIH HHS [ES62984] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Melatonin shows potential oncostatic action, and light exposure during night suppresses melatonin production. There is little information, however, about the direct effect of night work on the risk of cancer. We investigated the effect of night work in breast cancer. Methods: We examined the relationship between breast cancer and working on rotating night shifts during 10 years of follow-up in 78562 women from the Nurses' Health Study. Information was ascertained in 1988 about the total number of years during which the nurses had worked rotating night shifts with at least three nights per month. From June 1988 through May 1998, we documented 2441 redent breast cancer cases. Logistic regression models were used to calculate relative risks (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs), adjusted for confounding variables and breast cancer risk factors. All statistical tests were two-sided. Results: We observed a moderate increase in breast cancer risk among the women who worked 1-14 years or 15-29 years on rotating night shifts (multivariate adjusted RR = 1.08 [95% CI = 0.99 to 1.18] and RR = 1.08 [95% CI = 0.90 to 1.30], respectively). The risk was further increased among women who worked 30 or more years on the night shift (RR = 1.36; 95 % CI = 1.04 to 1.78). The test for trend was statistically significant (P = .02). Conclusions: Women who work on rotating night shifts with at least three nights per month, in addition to days and evenings in that month, appear to have a moderately increased risk of breast cancer after extended periods of working rotating night shifts.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据