4.7 Article

Metal enrichment of the intergalactic medium at z=3 by galactic winds

期刊

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
卷 560, 期 2, 页码 599-605

出版社

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1086/323070

关键词

cosmology : theory; galaxies : abundances; galaxies : starburst; intergalactic medium

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Studies of quasar absorption lines reveal that the low-density intergalactic medium (IGM) at z similar to3 is enriched to between 10(-3) and 10(-2) solar metallicity. This enrichment may have occurred in an early generation of Population III stars at redshift z greater than or similar to 10, by protogalaxies at 6 less than or similar to z less than or similar to 10, or by larger galaxies at 3 less than or similar to z less than or similar to 6. This paper addresses the third possibility by calculating the enrichment of the IGM at z greater than or similar to 3 by galaxies of baryonic mass greater than or similar to 10(8.5) M-circle dot. We use already completed cosmological simulations, to which we add a prescription for chemical evolution and metal ejection by winds, assuming that the winds have properties similar to those observed in local starbursts and Lyman break galaxies. Results are given for a number of representative models, and we also examine the properties of the galaxies responsible for the enrichment as well as the physical effects responsible for wind escape and propagation. We find that winds of velocity greater than or similar to 200-300 km s(-1) are capable of enriching the IGM to the mean level observed, although many low-density regions would remain metal free. Calibrated by observations of Lyman break galaxies, our calculations suggest that most galaxies at z greater than or similar to 3 should drive winds that can escape and propagate to large radii. The primary effect limiting the enrichment of low-density intergalactic gas in our scenario is then the travel time from high-to low-density regions, implying that the metallicity of low-density gas is a strong function of redshift.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据