4.5 Article

Grapefruit Juice Enhances the Exposure to Oral Oxycodone

期刊

BASIC & CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY & TOXICOLOGY
卷 107, 期 4, 页码 782-788

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1742-7843.2010.00582.x

关键词

-

资金

  1. Turku University Hospital [EVO 13821]
  2. Turku University Foundation, Turku, Finland
  3. Sigrid Juselius Foundation, Helsinki, Finland

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Grapefruit juice alters the concentrations of many CYP3A substrates. The objective of this study was to examine the effect of grapefruit juice on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of oral oxycodone in a randomized cross-over study with two phases at an interval of 4 weeks. Twelve healthy volunteers ingested 200 ml of grapefruit juice or water t.i.d. for 5 days. An oral dose of oxycodone hydrochloride 10 mg was administered on day 4. Oxycodone, noroxycodone, oxymorphone and noroxymorphone concentrations were analysed from the plasma samples for 48 hr and behavioural and analgesic effects were recorded for 12 hr. Grapefruit juice increased the mean area under the oxycodone concentration-time curve (AUC(0-infinity)) by 1.7-fold (p < 0.001), the peak plasma concentration by 1.5-fold (p < 0.001) and the half-life of oxycodone by 1.2-fold (p < 0.001) as compared to the water. The metabolite-to-parent AUC(0-infinity) ratios (AUC(m)/AUC(p)) of noroxycodone and noroxymorphone decreased by 44% (p < 0.001) and 45% (p < 0.001), respectively. Oxymorphone AUC(0-infinity) increased by 1.6-fold (p < 0.01) after grapefruit juice, but the AUC(m)/AUC(p) remained unchanged. Pharmacodynamic changes were modest and only self-reported performance significantly impaired after grapefruit juice. Analgesic effects were not influenced. Grapefruit juice inhibited the CYP3A4-mediated first-pass metabolism of oxycodone, decreased the formation of noroxycodone and noroxymorphone and increased that of oxymorphone. We conclude that dietary consumption of grapefruit products may increase the concentrations and effects of oxycodone in clinical use.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据