4.6 Article

Methylation-dependent silencing of the reduced folate carrier gene in inherently methotrexate-resistant human breast cancer cells

期刊

JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 276, 期 43, 页码 39990-40000

出版社

AMER SOC BIOCHEMISTRY MOLECULAR BIOLOGY INC
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M103181200

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The molecular basis of methotrexate resistance was studied in human MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cells, which are inherently defective in methotrexate uptake and lack expression of the reduced folate carrier (RFC). Transfection of MDA-MB-231 cells with RFC cDNA restored methotrexate uptake and increased methotrexate sensitivity by similar to 50-fold. A CpG island in the promoter region of RFC was found to be methylated in MDA-MB-231 cells, but was unmethylated in RFC expressing, methotrexate-sensitive MCF-7 breast cancer cells. Chromatin immunoprecipitation with antibodies against acetylated histories H3 and H4 showed that the RFC promoter was enriched for acetylated histories on expressed, unmethylated alleles only. Treatment of MDA-MB-231 cells with 5-aza-2'-deoxycytidine restored RFC expression but also led to increased methotrexate efflux and did not reverse methotrexate resistance. This suggests that 5-aza-2'-deoxycytidine up-regulates both methotrexate uptake and some methotrexate-resistance mechanism(s). Reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction analysis showed increased expression levels of several ATP-dependent efflux pumps in response to 5-aza-2'-deoxycytidine treatment, including P-glycoprotein and members of the multidrug resistance-associated protein family. Up-regulation of P-glycoprotein in response to 5-aza-2'-deoxycytidine was associated with demethylation of a CpG island in the MDR1 promoter, whereas the mechanism(s) for 5-aza-2'-deoxycytidine-induced up-regulation of multidrug resistance-associated proteins is probably indirect. Dipyridamole inhibited methotrexate efflux and reversed methotrexate resistance in 5-aza-2'-deoxycytidine-treated MDA-MB-231 cells.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据