4.8 Article

Inhibition of collagen synthesis with prolyl 4-hydroxylase inhibitor improves left ventricular function and alters the pattern of left ventricular dilatation after myocardial infarction

期刊

CIRCULATION
卷 104, 期 18, 页码 2216-2221

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1161/hc4301.097193

关键词

myocardial infarction; collagen; remodeling

资金

  1. NHLBI NIH HHS [HL62426, HL63704] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background-Left ventricular (LV) remodeling after myocardial infarction (MI) is associated with fibrosis, dilatation, and dysfunction. We postulated that prevention of fibrosis after MI with a prolyl 4-hydroxylase inhibitor (P4HI) would preserve LV function and attenuate LV enlargement. Methods and Results-Adult female rats (200 to 250 g) had experimental MI and were then randomized to treatment with P4HI (MI-FG041, n=29) or vehicle (MI-control, n=29) 48 hours after MI For 4 weeks in 2 phases. Echocardiograms were performed weekly with a 15-MHz linear transducer, and at 4 weeks, collagen isoform determinations and in vivo hemodynamics were performed. At randomization, the infarct size and LV function and size were similar in MI-FG041 and MI-control but significantly different from shams (n=9). At week 4, the LV function in MI-FG041 was significantly better than in MI-controls (fractional shortening 21% versus 16%, P=0.01; fractional area change 30% versus 19%, P=0.002; ejection fraction 35% versus 23%, P=0.001). In the FG041 group, LV area in systole was less (P <0.05), the dP/dt(max) after isoproterenol was higher (P <0.05), and types I and III collagen in noninfarcted LV were less than in MI-control. The hydroxyproline/proline ratio was increased by 64% in MI-control and reduced to the sham value in MI-FG041 rats. In the scar tissue, it was reduced by 24% in MI-FG041. Conclusions-This study demonstrates that prevention of interstitial fibrosis with a P4H inhibitor alters the pattern of LV enlargement and produces partial recovery of LV function after MI.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据