4.7 Article

In vitro maturation and fertilization of oocytes from unstimulated normal ovaries, polycystic ovaries, and women with polycystic ovary syndrome

期刊

FERTILITY AND STERILITY
卷 76, 期 5, 页码 936-942

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/S0015-0282(01)02853-9

关键词

in vitro maturation; IVF; oocytes; fertilization; polycystic ovaries; PCOS

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: To investigate differences in immature oocyte maturation, fertilization, and pregnancy rates among women with unstimulated normal ovaries, polycystic ovaries (PCOs), or PCOS. Design: Prospective observational study. Setting: University fertility clinic. Patient(s): One hundred forty-four women undergoing 180 in vitro oocyte maturation treatment cycles. Intervention(s): Transvaginal immature oocyte recovery from unstimulated ovaries 36 hours after hCG priming. In vitro oocyte maturation and fertilization. Fresh embryo transfer. Main Outcome Measure(s): Immature oocytes collected, metaphase II oocytes, and embryos produced. Implantation and pregnancy rates. Result(s): The overall oocyte maturation and fertilization rates attained were 80.3% (1,222 of 1,522) and 76.5% (935 of 1,222), respectively. Significantly fewer immature oocytes were retrieved from normal ovaries (5.1 +/- 3.7) compared with the PCO (10.0 +/- 5.1) or PCOS (11.3 +/- 9.0) groups. Fertilization and cleavage rates were comparable among the three groups. The implantation, pregnancy, and live birth rates per transfer for normal ovaries were 1.5%, 4.0%, and 2.0%, respectively; for PCOs 8.9%, 23.1%, 17.3%, respectively; and for women with PCOS 9.6%, 29.9%, and 14.9%, respectively. Conclusion(s): Immature oocytes retrieved from normal ovaries, PCOs, or women with PCOS, when using hCG priming before oocyte retrieval, have a similarly high maturation, fertilization, and cleavage potential. In vitro maturation is a useful treatment option, particularly for women with PCOs. (C) 2001 by American Society for Reproductive Medicine.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据