4.5 Article

Role of 4-hydroxynonenal in modification of cytochrome c oxidase in ischemia/reperfused rat heart

期刊

JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR AND CELLULAR CARDIOLOGY
卷 33, 期 11, 页码 1919-1927

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1006/jmcc.2001.1454

关键词

ischemia; reperfusion; 4-hydroxynonenal; cytochrome c oxidase; glutathione; protein adducts

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Mitochondrial dysfunction is a characteristic of ischemia/reperfusion (I/R) injury in the heart. While oxidative stress has been implicated in mitochondrial damage in I/R injury, the underlying mechanisms are unclear. 4-Hydroxynonenal (HNE) is a toxic aldehyde generated by lipid peroxidation. The purpose of the present study was to assess the role of HNE in I/R-induced damage of a crucial component of the mitochondrial electron transport chain, cytochrome c oxidase (COX). I/R was induced in male WKY rats by 15 mins of ischemia followed by reperfusion for up to 3 h. COX activity was measured spectrophotometrically at 550 nm. HNE adducts with COX subunits were detected by Western Blot using an HNE-histidine antibody HNE and reduced glutathione (GSH) contents were measured in mitochondria by HPLC. Following 3 h of reperfusion, COX activity was reduced to 59% of control, accompanied by increases in HNE adducts with COX (P <0.05). Mitochondrial. HNE content in reperfused hearts was increased to 165% of control, whereas GSH was decreased to 62% of control (P <0.05). After purified COX was incubated with HNE in vitro, COX activity was decreased progressively with increasing concentrations of HNE, accompanied by concentration-dependent formation of HNE adducts with COX. GSH prevented HNE adduct formation as well as COX inhibition by HNE. These results suggest that HNE, via adduct formation with COX subunits, plays an important role in COX dysfunction caused by reperfusion. The Endings also indicate that decreases in mitochondrial GSH stores in reperfused myocardium could potentiate HNE-mediated COX damage. (C) 2001 Academic Press.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据