4.7 Article

Structure of plaque at carotid bifurcation - High-resolution MRI with histological correlation

期刊

STROKE
卷 32, 期 11, 页码 2516-2521

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1161/hs1101.098663

关键词

arterial wall; carotid arteries; magnetic resonance imaging

资金

  1. NHLBI NIH HHS [HL-56307, HL-61806] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background and Purpose-The composition of carotid atherosclerosis was visualized by using 3D MRI at high resolution with 200-mum(3) voxels. Magnetic resonance signal characteristics were correlated with plaque components, including collagenous cap, necrotic core, and calcification, to define resolution and other requirements for future clinical carotid MRI. Methods-Twenty-one en bloc carotid endarterectomy specimens were imaged ex vivo by 3D gradient-echo MRI by using a 1.5-T clinical scanner with repetition time, echo time, and flip angle of 40 ms. 18 ms, and 20 degrees, respectively. Plaques were placed in Gd-saline and imaged in a solenoid radiofrequency coil. For quantitative tissue-specific signal analysis, techniques were developed to match tissue sections analyzed by MRI and histology. Results-Three-dimensional imaging resolved complex morphological features not visualized by density- or T-2-weighted 2D spin-echo imaging. The collagenous cap, necrotic core, and areas of focal calcification showed differing signal characteristics: mean contrast-to- noise ratio for cap versus underlying core was 20. The signal distributions for media and necrotic core overlapped but were resolvable in most specimens. The signal from thrombus was variable. Conclusions-En bloc specimens provide a useful model for studying plaque MRI. By use of isotropic submillimeter resolution, the collagenous cap and underlying necrotic core typically can be distinguished, and calcification can be identified. Thrombus displays a wide variation in signal intensity. The techniques presented could facilitate future clinicohistological correlation studies for atherosclerotic plaque MRI.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据