3.8 Article

Determinants of Staphylococcus aureus nasal carriage

期刊

出版社

AMER SOC MICROBIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1128/CDLI.8.6.1064-1069.2001

关键词

-

资金

  1. NHLBI NIH HHS [R01 HL046809, HL46809, R01 HL070876, P50 HL67665, F32 HL010181, P50 HL067665] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIAID NIH HHS [AI48167] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Nasal carriage of Staphylococcus aureus has been identified as a risk factor for community-acquired and nosocomial infections. We screened 230 donors of diverse ethnic and socioeconomic backgrounds and identified 62 (27%) whose nasal secretions were colonized by S. aureus. In 18 donors in whom the various regions of the nasal luminal surface were separately sampled, the predominant region of S. aureus colonization was the moist squamous epithelium on the septum adjacent to the nasal ostium. Nasal fluid from carriers was defective in killing endogenous S. aureus and nasal carrier isolates of S. aureus but not a laboratory S. aureus strain. Transmission electron microscopy revealed that S. aureus isolates incubated in nasal fluid from carriers for 2 h at 37 degreesC were less damaged than those incubated in noncarrier fluid and were coated with an electron-dense layer. Compared with that from healthy donors and patients with acute rhinitis, nasal fluid from carriers contained elevated concentrations of the neutrophil-derived defensins human neutrophil peptides 1 to 3 (47- and 4-fold increases, respectively), indicative of a neutrophil-mediated inflammatory host response to S. aureus colonization. The concentration of the inducible epithelial antimicrobial peptide human beta -defensin 2 was also highly elevated compared to that in healthy donors, in whom the level was below the detection limit, or patients with acute rhinitis (sixfold increase). Thus, nasal carriage of S. aureus takes hold in nasal fluid that is permissive for colonization and induces a local inflammatory response that fails to clear the colonizing bacteria.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据