4.7 Article

Actin carbonylation: From a simple marker of protein oxidation to relevant signs of severe functional impairment

期刊

FREE RADICAL BIOLOGY AND MEDICINE
卷 31, 期 9, 页码 1075-1083

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/S0891-5849(01)00690-6

关键词

actin carbonylation; actin functional impairment; dityrosine; intermolecular cross-linking; hypochlorous acid; free radicals

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The number of protein-bound carbonyl groups is an established marker of protein oxidation. Recent evidence indicates a significant increase in actin carbonyl content in both Alzheimer's disease brains and ischemic hearts. The enhancement of actin carbonylation, causing the disruption of the actin cytoskeleton and the loss of the barrier function, has also been found in human colonic cells after exposure to hypochlorous acid (HOCI). Here, the effects of oxidation induced by HOCI on purified actin are presented. Results show that HOCI causes a rapidly increasing yield of carbonyl groups. However, when carbonylation becomes evident, some Cys and Met residues have been already oxidized. Covalent intermolecular cross-linking as well as some noncovalent aggregation of carbonylated actin have been found. The covalent cross-linking, unaffected by reducing and denaturing agents, parallels an increase in dityrosine fluorescence. Moreover, HOCI-mediated oxidation induces the progressive disruption of actin filaments and the inhibition of F-actin formation. The molar ratios of HOCI to actin that lead to inhibition of actin polymerization seem to have effect only on cysteines and methionines. The process that involves oxidation of amino acid side chains with formation of a carbonyl group would occur at an extent of oxidative insult higher than that causing the oxidation of some critical amino acid residues. Therefore, the increase in actin content of carbonyl groups found in vivo would indicate drastic oxidative modification leading to drastic functional impairments. (C) 2001 Elsevier Science Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据