3.9 Article

Gene-expression analysis of sucrose-starch metabolism during pollen maturation in cytoplasmic male-sterile and fertile lines of sorghum

期刊

SEXUAL PLANT REPRODUCTION
卷 14, 期 3, 页码 127-134

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00497-001-0105-5

关键词

pollen maturation; cytoplasmic male sterility; starch biosynthesis; gene expression; sorghum

向作者/读者索取更多资源

During pollen maturation, single-celled microspores undergo a rapid phase of starch biosynthesis, presumably from sucrose stored in the vacuoles. Very little is known about the genes and the intracellular controls that regulate the sucrose --> starch pathway in such microspores. We show here RNA profiles in sorghum microspores during the transition from vacuolated microspore to immature pollen at two specific stages of pollen development: early, showing little or no detectable starch, and late, when pollen are active in starch-filling. We have also examined two near-isogenic cytoplasmic male sterile lines that retain fully turgid immature pollen until the starch-filling stage, but remain starch-deficient, and ultimately form inviable pollen. Using maize cDNA clones, both temporal and genotypic differences were observed in the expression profiles of four metabolic genes (soluble or vacuolar invertase, Ivr2; sucrose synthase, Sus1; phosphoglucomutase, Pgm; and a subunit of ADPG pyrophosphorylase, Bt2), two similar metabolic regulatory genes (Grf1 and Grf2, encoding 14-3-3 proteins) and a transcription factor, ZmMADS1. Western blot analyses were conducted to visualize sucrose synthase, SS2; AGPase, BT2 and the GRF (14-3-3) proteins. Temporal differences of both a qualitative and quantitative nature were observed in all three proteins in both male-fertile and male-sterile lines. We suggest that these changes in gene expression may result from increased and decreased sink strengths and associated changes in carbohydrate metabolism in starch-filled (fertile) and starch-deficient (sterile) pollen, respectively.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.9
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据