4.8 Article

Capillary LC-MS2 at the attomole level for monitoring and discovering endogenous peptides in microdialysis samples collected in vivo

期刊

ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 73, 期 21, 页码 5005-5014

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/ac010774d

关键词

-

资金

  1. NINDS NIH HHS [NS38476] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Fused-silica capillary LC columns (25-mum i.d.) with 3-mum-i.d. integrated electrospray emitters interfaced to a quadrupole ion trap mass spectrometer were evaluated for high-sensitivity LC-MS2. Column preparation involved constructing frits by in situ photopolymerization of glycidyl methacrylate and trimethylolpropane trimethacrylate, preparing the electrospray emitter by pulling the column outlet to a fine tip with a CO2 laser puller, and slurry-packing the column with 5-mum reversed-phase particles. Large-volume injections were facilitated by an automated two-pump system that allowed high-flow rates for sample loading and low-flow rates for elution. Small electrospray emitters, low elution flow rates, and optimization of gradient steepness allowed a detection limit of 4 amol, corresponding to 2 pM for 1.8 muL injected on-column, for a mixture of peptides dissolved in artificial cerebral spinal fluid. The system was coupled on-line to microdialysis sampling and was used to monitor and discover endogenous neuropeptides from the globus pallidus of anesthetized. male Sprague-Dawley rats. Time-segmented MS2 scans enabled simultaneous monitoring of Met-enkephalin, Leu-enkephalin, and unknown peptides. Basal dialysate levels of Met-enkephalin and Leu-enkephalin were 60 +/- 30 and 70 +/- 20 pM while K-(+)-stimulated levels were 1900 +/- 500 and 1300 +/- 300 pM, respectively (n = 7). Data-dependent and time-segmented MS2 scans revealed several unknown peptides that were present in dialysate. One of the unknowns was identified as peptide I1-10 (SPQLEDEAKE), a novel product of preproenkephalin A processing, using MS2, MS3, and database searching.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据