4.7 Article

Characterization of the prostanoid receptor types involved in mediating calcitonin gene-related peptide release from cultured rat trigeminal neurones

期刊

BRITISH JOURNAL OF PHARMACOLOGY
卷 134, 期 6, 页码 1296-1302

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1038/sj.bjp.0704357

关键词

prostanoids; prostaglandin E-2; prostacyclin; migraine; calcitonin gene-related peptide; trigeminal ganglion; primary culture

向作者/读者索取更多资源

1 Prostaglandins and the vasodilator neuropeptide, calcitonin-gene related peptide (CGRP), have both been implicated in the pathogenesis of migraine headache. We have used primary cultures of adult rat trigeminal neurones to examine the effects of prostanoids on CGRP release in vitro. 2 CGRP release was stimulated by prostaglandin E-2 (PGE(2)) and the IP receptor agonist, carbaprostacyclin (cPGI(2)). These responses were extracellular calcium-dependent, and the PGE(2)-induced CGRP release was unaltered by inhibition of nitric oxide synthase (NOS), ATP receptor blockade, or the addition of adenosine deaminase. 3 Increases in CGRP levels were also observed in response to prostaglandin D-2 (PGD(2)), and the EP2 receptor selective agonist, butaprost. No increases in CGRP release were observed in response to prostaglandin F-2x (PGF(2x)) or the TP receptor selective agonist, U46619, or the EP3 receptor selective agonist, GR63799X. 4 The selective DP receptor antagonist, BWA868C, antagonized the PGD(2)-, but not PGE(2)- or cPGI(2)-induced release. Furthermore, the EP1 selective antagonist, ZM325802, failed to antagonize the PGE(2)-induced CGRP release from these cells. 5 These data indicate that activation of DP, EP and IP receptors can each cause CGRP release from trigeminal neurones, and suggest that the predominant EP receptor subtype involved may be the EP2 receptor. Together with evidence that the cyclo-oxygenase inhibitor, aspirin, particularly when administered intravenously is effective in treating acute migraine, these findings further suggest a role for prostaglandins in migraine pathophysiology.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据