4.5 Article

Biosynthetic response and mechanical properties of articular cartilage after injurious compression

期刊

JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC RESEARCH
卷 19, 期 6, 页码 1140-1146

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/S0736-0266(01)00033-X

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIAMS NIH HHS [AR45779] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Traumatic joint injury is known to produce osteoarthritic degeneration of articular cartilage. To study the effects of injurious compression on the degradation and repair of cartilage in vitro, we developed a model that allows strain and strain rate-controlled loading of cartilage explants. The influence of strain rate on both cartilage matrix biosynthesis and mechanical properties was assessed after single injurious compressions. Loading with a strain rate of 0.01 s(-1) to a final strain of 50% resulted in no measured effect on the cells or on the extracellular matrix, although peak stresses reached levels of about 12 MPa. However, compression with strain rates of 0.1 and 1 s(-1) caused peak stresses of approximately 18 and 24 MPa, respectively, and resulted in significant decreases in both proteoglycan and total protein biosynthesis. The mechanical properties of the explants (compressive and shear stiffness) were also reduced with increasing strain rate. Additionally, cell viability decreased with increasing strain rate, and the remaining viable cells lost their ability to exhibit an increase in biosynthesis in response to low-amplitude dynamic mechanical Stimulation. This latter decrease in reparative response was most dramatic in the tissue compressed at the highest strain rates. We conclude that strain rate (like peak stress or strain) is an important parameter in defining mechanical injury, and that cartilage injuriously compressed at high strain rates can lose its characteristic anabolic response to low-amplitude cyclic mechanical loading. (C) 2001 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据