3.9 Article

Decompression Sickness Risk at 6553 m Breathing Two Gas Mixtures

期刊

AVIATION SPACE AND ENVIRONMENTAL MEDICINE
卷 81, 期 12, 页码 1069-1077

出版社

AEROSPACE MEDICAL ASSOC
DOI: 10.3357/ASEM.2837.2010

关键词

altitude (sub-atmospheric) decompression sickness; venous gas emboli; molecular sieve oxygen concentrator; onboard oxygen generation oxygen; nitrogen argon; aircrew

资金

  1. UK Ministry of Defence

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Introduction The risk of severe decompression sickness (DCS) in creases rapidly above 6248 m (20,500 ft) and is greater when breathing higher proportions of inert gas Contemporary aircrew may be exposed to higher cabin altitudes while breathing molecular sieve oxygen concentrator (MSOC) product gas containing variable concentrations of oxygen, nitrogen, and argon This study assessed the risk of DCS at 6553 m (21,500 ft) breathing two simulated MSOC product gas mixtures Methods In a hypobaric chamber, 10 subjects each undertook 2 4 h exposures at 6553 m breathing either 75% O-2 21% N-2 4% Ar or 56% O-2 42% N-2 2% Ar Subjects undertook regular activities simulating in flight movements of fast jet aircrew Venous gas emboli (VGE) bubble load was graded every 15 min using 2D and Doppler echocardiography by experienced operators blinded to breathing gas composition Results DCS occurred in five exposures (25%), the earliest after less than 90 mm at altitude All were minor, single site, uncomplicated limb bends that resolved with recompression VGE occurred in 85% of exposures with some early onset, heavy loads Survival (Probit) analysis indicated that breathing 56% oxygen significantly decreased VGE latency relative to breathing 75% oxygen (relative potency 3 05) Conclusions From 20 experimental exposures, the risk of DCS at 6553 m is estimated at 5% by 90 min and 20% at 3 h Exploiting the negative predictive value of VGE latency as a surrogate measure of protection from DCS, at high cabin altitudes better MSOC performance (higher product gas oxygen concentrations) will protect more aircrew for longer

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.9
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据