4.1 Article

Discrimination between endogenous and exogenous water sources in juvenile rainbow trout fed extruded dry feed

期刊

AQUATIC LIVING RESOURCES
卷 14, 期 6, 页码 359-366

出版社

EDP SCIENCES S A
DOI: 10.1016/S0990-7440(01)01131-7

关键词

drinking rate; water sources; feeding; moisturizing; stomach secretion; rainbow trout

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A tracer (Cr-51-EDTA) study was undertaken with juvenile (20 g) freshwater rainbow trout, Oncorhynchus mykiss, using an experimental design that minimized stress effects during feeding and drinking trials. A calculation procedure was developed, where feed intake (pellet number), tracer intake (mL, water in stomach contents (g) and drinking rate (mL-kg(-1).h(-1)) are essential to discriminate between the major stomach water sources prandially and postprandially: water bound in food; initial water absorption of pellets prandial water intake; postprandial water intake and endogenous stomach secretion. We put forward the hypothesis that intake of dry food with a minor water content (10 %) may impose a demand for water to moisture the feed up to the level in natural feed (75 %) as preparation for gastric emptying, whereafter food is ready to pass from the stomach through the pyloric sphincter. Moisture content of pellets increased from 9.4 to 24.9 % in the pre-meal period. The pellets were ingested with 4.0 to 19.3 muL water per pellet, reflecting high inter-individual variation. Prandially moisture content rose to 52 % and further increased to 56 % in the delay period. Moisture content was ca. 65 %, when pellets began to disintegrate and move through the sphincter in accordance with the hypothesis. Stomach secretion contributed 34-44 % of the stomach water and ingested water 25-35 %, The sampling and calculation procedure gave convincing evidence for the detailed stomach water budget and this individual,approach can be very useful in comparisons of artificial and natural diets. (C) 2001 Ifremer/CNRS/Inra/IRD/Cemagref/Editions scientifiques et medicales Elsevier SAS.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据