4.5 Article

Pneumococcal carriage in children during their first two years: important role of family exposure

期刊

PEDIATRIC INFECTIOUS DISEASE JOURNAL
卷 20, 期 11, 页码 1022-1027

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/00006454-200111000-00004

关键词

Streptococcus pneumoniae; nasopharyngeal carriage; transmission; carrier state; family studies

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background. Close family and day-care contacts have been identified as risk factors for pneumococcal (Pnc) carriage. This study addresses the risk of Pnc carriage by infants 2 to 24 months of age in terms of simultaneous carriage of pneumococcus by family members. Methods. Nasopharyngeal swabs were collected from 100 Finnish infants and their family members on 10 scheduled visits (when infant was 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18 and 24 months of age). The 7 most common pneumococcal serogroups (4,6,9, 14, 18, 19, 23), also represented in the new heptavalent Pnc conjugate vaccine, were analyzed. Marginal logistic regression analyses were performed to assess the relative importance of different predictors for carriage. Results. The carriage of the studied Pnc serogroups increased with age, being highest at the age of 18 months (28%). Among children older than 6 months of age, the strongest predictor of carriage was simultaneous carriage of the same serogroup by another family member (odds ratio, 3.8; 95% confidence interval, 2.1 to 6.9). At the age of 6 months or younger, carriage was rare and was not significantly associated with a family ;carriage. Conclusions. Young infants (less than or equal to6 months old) were largely protected from pneumococcal carriage. After this age family transmission seemed very important despite the small family size. Contrary to some earlier studies communal day care was not associated with an increased risk of Pnc carriage. This could be partly because of the long parental leave in Finland and thus the late age of starting organized day care.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据