4.5 Article

Role of opioid delta1 receptors, mitochondrial K(ATP) channels, and protein kinase C during cardiocyte apoptosis

期刊

JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR AND CELLULAR CARDIOLOGY
卷 33, 期 11, 页码 2007-2014

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1006/jmcc.2001.1464

关键词

opioid delta-1 receptors; preconditioning; mitochondrial K-ATP channels; PKC isoforms; apoptosis

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Opioids attenuate cardiac injury after ischemia and reperfusion. We wanted to determine whether the protection of opioids is mediated by blocking cardiocyte apoptosis. and if so, to describe the role of opioid delta (1) receptors and protein kinase C (PKC) in this effect. Chick embryonic cardiomyocytes were subjected to 12 h of simulated ischemia and then 12 h of re-oxygenation, which resulted in 54 +/- 3% (n = 6) of cell apoptosis (n = 6) as measured by flow cytometry. This result was consistent with DNA laddering and TUNEL assay. Preconditioning, elicited with three cycles of 1 min of simulated ischemia separated by 5 min of reoxygenation before prolonged simulated ischemia, reduced apoptosis (36 +/- 4%, n = 6*); Pretreatment with BNTX (0.1 mu mol/l), a selective opioid delta (1) receptor blocker, abolished the effects of preconditioning (57 +/- 5 %, n = 6). The selective opioid 6 receptor agonist BW373U86 (20 pmol/l) also attenuated apoptosis (39 +/- 3%, n = 6* v control). These effects were abolished by 5-hydroxydecanoate (100 muM), a selective mitochondrial K-ATP channel blocker (50 +/- 5%. n = 6) and by Go-6976 (0.1 pmol/l), a specific PKC inhibitor. Both preconditioning and BW373U86 activated the PKC 6 isoform of particulate fraction before simulated ischemia without effect on total and cytosolic fractions. Stimulation of opioid delta (1) receptors activates mitochondrial K-ATP channels and the PKC 6 isoform in cultured ventricular myocytes. This is one important signal transduction pathway through which ischemic preconditioning blocks apoptosis and preserves cardiac function. (C) 2001 Academic Press.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据