4.3 Article

Postoperative wound infection after instrumentation of thoracic and lumbar fractures

期刊

JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC TRAUMA
卷 15, 期 8, 页码 566-569

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/00005131-200111000-00006

关键词

spine trauma; infection; spinal cord injury; spine instrumentation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: To assess the risk of infection in trauma patients undergoing surgical intervention with instrumentation for thoracic and lumbar fractures. Data Sources: A case series of 235 consecutive patients who sustained thoracic and lumbar fractures seen at Tampa General Hospital in Tampa, Florida between 1986 and 1997. Study Selection: 117 patients of the 235 consecutive patients included in the case series underwent surgical intervention of these patients, twelve were identified as having acute postoperative wound infections. Data Extraction: Of those patients treated with operative decompression and internal fixation. the authors identified and studied those with an acute wound infection. These patients were analyzed for risk factors and infection management. Data Synthesis: Twelve (10 percent) patients with acute postoperative wound infections were identified. These included nine deep and three superficial infections. This provides an overall infection rate of 10 percent ( 12 of 117). Of these, there were three infections in twenty-one patients undergoing anterior spinal procedures. Only two of the twelve patients had pure cultures of grampositive organisms (2 Staphylococcus aureus). Cultures from eight (67 percent) patients showed multiple organisms. There was a significantly (P < 0.05) higher risk of infection in the patients with a complete neurologic injury 41 percent (7/17) as compared with those with no deficit or incomplete injuries 5.0 percent (5/100). Conclusions: The overall risk of infection is higher in the trauma patient than in the elective surgery population. Those patients with a complete neurologic deficit are at a greater risk. Aggressive and early intervention can help contribute to a favorable outcome.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据