4.6 Article

Effects of aging on hand function

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY
卷 49, 期 11, 页码 1478-1484

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1046/j.1532-5415.2001.4911240.x

关键词

aging; finger pinch; precision grip; pinch force; dexterity

资金

  1. NICHD NIH HHS [HD-36725] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this stud), was to quantify age-induced changes in handgrip and finger-pinch strength, ability to maintain a stead), submaximal finger pinch force and pinch posture, speed in relocating small objects with finger grip, and ability to discriminate two identical mechanical stimuli applied to the finger tip. DESIGN: A cross-sectional study. SETTINGS: Greater Cleveland area of Ohio. PARTICIPANTS: Healthy, independent, young (n = 27, range 20-35 years) and older (n = 28, range 65-79 years) subjects. MEASUREMENTS: Handgrip strength, maximum pinch force (MPF), ability to maintain a steady pinch force at three relative force levels (5%, 10%, and 20% MPF) and three absolute force levels (2.5 Newtons (N), 4 N, and 8 N), ability to maintain a precision pinch posture, speed in relocating pegs from a nearby location onto the pegboard, and the shortest distance for discriminating two stimuli were measured in both young and older groups. RESULTS: Compared,vith young subjects, the older group's handgrip force was 30% weaker (P < .001), MPF was 26% lower (P < .05), and ability to maintain steady submaximal pinch force and a precision pinch posture was significantly less (P < .05). The time taken to relocate the pegs and the distance needed to discriminate two identical stimuli increased significantly with age (P < .01). The decrease in the ability to maintain steady submaximal pinch force was more pronounced in women than men. CONCLUSION: Aging has a degenerative effect on hand function, including declines in hand and finger strength and ability to control submaximal pinch force and maintain a steady precision pinch posture, manual speed, and hand sensation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据