4.2 Article

Selected Blood Chemistry and Gas Reference Ranges for Broiler Breeders Using the i-STAT® Handheld Clinical Analyzer

期刊

AVIAN DISEASES
卷 54, 期 3, 页码 1016-1020

出版社

AMER ASSOC AVIAN PATHOLOGISTS
DOI: 10.1637/9223-122209-Reg.1

关键词

blood chemistry; broiler breeders; chickens; diagnostics; i-STAT (R); metabolic disease; poultry; sampling technique

资金

  1. North Carolina Breeder and Hatchery Association

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Selected blood chemistry and gas reference ranges for clinically healthy broiler breeder hens were established using CG8+ cartridges in an i-STAT(R) handheld point-of-care clinical analyzer. Samples from 165 hens (25-36 wk of age), representing three broiler breeder strains reared by four integrators, were evaluated. A standardized sampling technique was developed to minimize instrument error readings. The following reference ranges and means, respectively, were determined: sodium (141.6-152.6, 147.1 [mmol/L]), potassium (4.1-5.7, 4.9 [mmol/L]), ionized calcium (1.20-1.73, 1.47 [mmol/L]), glucose (207.2-260.7, 234.0 [mg/dl]), hematocrit (21.3-30.8, 26.1 [% packed cell volume]), hemoglobin (7.3-10.5, 8.9 [g/dl]), pH (7.28-7.57, 7.42), carbon dioxide partial pressure (25.9-49.5, 37.7 [mm Hg]), oxygen partial pressure (32.0-60.5, 46.2 [mm Hg]), bicarbonate (18.9-30.3, 24.6 [mmol/L]), total carbon dioxide (19.9-31.5, 25.7 [mmol/L]), base excess (26.8 to 7.2, 0.2), and oxygen saturation (70.6-93.3, 82.0 [%]). Wide ranges in blood gases and base excess occurred in all strains. Cobb strain hens had significantly lower glucose and higher partial and saturated oxygen values compared with two Ross strains. Significant differences in several blood parameters were found among different integrators and in older postpeak production birds. The i-STAT handheld point-of-care clinical analyzer provides rapid, relatively low cost, blood chemistry values that are useful for investigating broiler breeder flock diseases of unknown or uncertain etiology, especially those suspected of having a metabolic cause.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据