4.8 Article

Exceptional sensitivity of rubisco activase to thermal denaturation in vitro and in vivo

期刊

PLANT PHYSIOLOGY
卷 127, 期 3, 页码 1053-1064

出版社

AMER SOC PLANT BIOLOGISTS
DOI: 10.1104/pp.127.3.1053

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Heat stress inhibits photosynthesis by reducing the activation of Rubisco by Rubisco activase. To determine if loss of activase function is caused by protein denaturation, the thermal stability of activase was examined in vitro and in vivo and compared with the stabilities of two other soluble chloroplast proteins. Isolated activase exhibited a temperature optimum for ATP hydrolysis of 44 degreesC compared with greater than or equal to 60 degreesC for carboxylation by Rubisco. Light scattering showed that unfolding/aggregation occurred at 45 degreesC and 37 degreesC for activase in the presence and absence of ATP gammaS, respectively, and at 65 degreesC for Rubisco. Addition of chemically denatured rhodanese to heat-treated activase trapped. partially folded activase in an insoluble complex at treatment temperatures that were similar to those that caused increased light scattering and loss of activity. To examine thermal stability in vivo, heat-treated tobacco (Nicotiana rustica cv Pulmila) protoplasts and chloroplasts were lysed with detergent in the presence of rhodanese and the amount of target protein that aggregated was determined by immunoblotting. The results of these experiments showed that thermal denaturation of activase in vivo occurred at temperatures similar to those that denatured isolated activase and far below those required to denature Rubisco or phosphoribulokinase. Edman degradation analysis of aggregated proteins from tobacco and pea (Pisum sativum cv Little Marvel) chloroplasts showed that activase was the major protein that denatured in response to heat stress. Thus, loss of activase activity during heat stress is caused by an exceptional sensitivity of the protein to thermal denaturation and is responsible, in part, for deactivation of Rubisco.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据