4.8 Article

TAK1/JNK and p38 have opposite effects on rat hepatic stellate cells

期刊

HEPATOLOGY
卷 34, 期 5, 页码 953-963

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1053/jhep.2001.28790

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIAAA NIH HHS [AA11605] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIDDK NIH HHS [DK34987] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NIGMS NIH HHS [GM41804] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

After liver injury, hepatic stellate cells (HSCs) undergo a process of activation with expression of smooth muscle cz-actin (a-SMA), an increased proliferation rate, and a dramatic increase in synthesis of type I collagen. The intracellular signaling mechanisms of activation and perpetuation of the activated phenotype in HSCs are largely unknown. In this study the role of the stress-activated protein kinases, c-Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK) and p38, were evaluated in primary cultures of rat HSCs. The effect of JNK was assessed by using an adenovirus expressing a dominant negative form of transforming growth factor beta (TGF-beta)-activated kinase 1 (TAK1) (Ad5dnTAK1) and a new selective pharmacologic inhibitor SP600125. The effect of p38 was assessed with the selective pharmacologic inhibitor SB203580. These kinases were inhibited starting either in quiescent HSCs (culture day 1) or in activated HSCs (culture day 5). Although blocking TAK1/JNK and p38 decreased the expression of alpha -SMA protein in early stages of HSC activation, no effect was observed when TAK1/JNK or p38 were inhibited in activated HSCs. JNK inhibition increased and p38 inhibition decreased collagen alpha1(I) mRNA level as measured by RNase protection assays, with maximal effects observed in early stages of HSC activation. Furthermore, TAK1/JNK inhibition decreased HSC proliferation, whereas p38 inhibition led to an increased proliferation rate of HSCs, independently of its activation status. These results show novel roles for the TAK1/JNK pathway and p38 during HSC activation in culture. Despite similar activators of TAK1/JNK and p38, their functions in HSCs are distinct and opposed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据