4.7 Article

Nucleoside transporter subtype expression:: effects on potency of adenosine kinase inhibitors

期刊

BRITISH JOURNAL OF PHARMACOLOGY
卷 134, 期 5, 页码 1037-1044

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/sj.bjp.0704349

关键词

nucleoside transport; ENT1; ENT2; CNT2; nitrobenzylthioinosine; adenosine kinase; 5-iodotubercidin; 5-amino-5 '-deoxyadenosine; C6 glioma cells

向作者/读者索取更多资源

1 Adenosine kinase (AK) inhibitors can enhance adenosine levels and potentiate adenosine receptor activation. As the AK inhibitors 5' iodotubercidin (ITU) and 5-amino-5'-deoxyadenosine (NH(2)dAdo) are nucleoside analogues, we hypothesized that nucleoside transporter subtype expression can affect the potency of these inhibitors in intact cells. 2 Three nucleoside transporter subtypes that mediate adenosine permeation of rat cells have been characterized and cloned: equilibrative transporters rENT1 and rENT2 and concentrative transporter rCNT2. We stably transfected rat C6 glioma cells, which express rENT2 nucleoside transporters, with rENT1 (rENT1-C6 cells) or rCNT2 (rCNT2-C6 cells) nucleoside transporters. 3 We tested the effects of ITU and NH(2)dAdo on [H-3]-adenosine uptake and conversion to [H-3]-adenine nucleotides in the three cell types. NH(2)dAdo did not show any cell type selectivity. In contrast, ITU showed significant inhibition of [H-3]-adenosine uptake and [H-3]-adenine nucleotide formation at concentrations less than or equal to 100 nm in rENT1-C6 cells, while concentrations greater than or equal to3 mum were required for C6 or rCNT2-C6 cells. 4 Nitrobenzylthioinosine (NBMPR; 100 nm), a selective inhibitor of rENT1, abolished the effects of nanomolar concentrations of ITU in rENT1-C6 cells. 5 This study demonstrates that the effects of ITU, but not NH(2)dAdo, in whole cell assays are dependent upon nucleoside transporter subtype expression. Thus, cellular and tissue differences in expression of nucleoside transporter subtypes may affect the pharmacological actions of some AK inhibitors.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据