4.7 Article

Comparative toxicity of acrylic acid to marine and freshwater microalgae and the significance for environmental effects assessments

期刊

CHEMOSPHERE
卷 45, 期 4-5, 页码 653-658

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/S0045-6535(01)00044-3

关键词

freshwater; marine; algae; acrylic acid; hazard assessment

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, we compared the sensitivity of freshwater and marine organisms to two structurally similar substances, acrylic acid and methacrylic, acid. Reported acute toxicity data (L(E)C-50-values) for freshwater organisms range from 0.1 to 222 mg/l and 85 to > 130 mg/l for acrylic acid and methacrylic acid, respectively. The large variation in toxicity data for acrylic acid is due to a specific toxicity to certain species of freshwater microalgae, with algae EC50-values being two to three orders of magnitude lower than L(E)C-50-values reported for fish and invertebrates. To evaluate the sensitivity of marine organisms, ecotoxicity data was generated for ten species of microalgae, one invertebrate species and one fish species. For methacrylic acid, we found a marine acute toxicity that ranged from 110 to > 1260 mg/l, which is comparable to reported data on freshwater organisms. In strong contrast, the resulting L(E)C-50-values for acrylic acid ranged from 50 to > 1000 mg/l, and there was no specific sensitivity of marine algae when compared to marine invertebrates and fish. For acrylic acid, therefore, use of the available freshwater toxicity data for an effects assessment for the marine environment is likely to overestimate the hazard and risk from this substance. Overall, the results of the study suggest that ecotoxicity data generated on freshwater species may not always be appropriate for the effects assessments of organic chemicals in the marine environment, thus emphasising the importance of using ecologically relevant data to assess environmental risk. (C) 2001 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据