4.2 Article

Evaluation of renal biopsy samples of patients with diabetic nephropathy

期刊

INTERNAL MEDICINE
卷 40, 期 11, 页码 1077-1084

出版社

JAPAN SOC INTERNAL MEDICINE
DOI: 10.2169/internalmedicine.40.1077

关键词

mesangial expansion; tubulointerstitial injury; glomerulosclerosis

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective To evaluate the usefulness of renal biopsy in the overall management of patients with diabetes mellitus (DM), we examined the relationship between the clinical parameters and histopathological findings of renal biopsy samples. Methods Renal biopsy specimens were obtained from 109 type 2 diabetic patients with proteinuria. Samples were divided into the following two groups: Diabetic Nephropathy (DN) group (n=80) had typical diabetic lesions without other renal diseases, complication group (n=29) had diabetic lesions with other renal diseases. Furthermore, DN group was subdivided into two subgroups: slow progressive group (SP group, n=32), the level of serum creatinine (s-Cr) was normal at the time of renal biopsy and three years after renal biopsy, and fast progressive group (Fl? group, n=14), the level of s-Cr was normal at the time of renal biopsy but more than doubled three years after renal biopsy. Results The level of total protein was significantly lower and HbA1c significantly higher in the DN group than in the Complication group. However, other clinical parameters were not significantly different between the two groups. Urinary protein, systolic and diastolic blood pressure in FP group were significantly higher than in SP group. The percentage of sclerotic glomeruli, the severity of mesangial expansion, tubular injury and cell infiltration were significantly greater in FP than in SP group. Conclusions Our results indicated that a complete evaluation of renal pathology in DM could not be made by clinical parameters only, and that the progression of DN could be accurately predicted by histopathological evaluation. Therefore, this study emphasizes the importance of renal biopsy in the overall management of patients with DM and/ or DN.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据