4.8 Editorial Material

Autophagy promotes BrafV600E-driven lung tumorigenesis by preserving mitochondrial metabolism

期刊

AUTOPHAGY
卷 10, 期 2, 页码 384-385

出版社

LANDES BIOSCIENCE
DOI: 10.4161/auto.27320

关键词

autophagy; metabolism; Braf; oncocytoma; glutamine; NSCLC

资金

  1. NCI NIH HHS [R01CA130893, R37 CA53370, P30 CA072720, R01 CA163591, R37 CA053370, R01 CA130893, RC1 CA147961] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The role of autophagy in cancer is complex and context-dependent. Here we describe work with genetically engineered mouse models of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in which the tumor-suppressive and tumor-promoting function of autophagy can be visualized in the same system. We discovered that early tumorigenesis in Braf(V600E)-driven lung cancer is accelerated by autophagy ablation due to unmitigated oxidative stress, as observed with loss of Nfe2l2/Nrf2-mediated antioxidant defense. However, this growth advantage is eventually overshadowed by progressive mitochondrial dysfunction and metabolic insufficiency, and is associated with increased survival of mice bearing autophagy-deficient tumors. Atg7 deficiency alters progression of Braf(V600E)-driven tumors from adenomas (Braf(V600E); atg7(-/-)) and adenocarcinomas (trp53(-/-); Braf(V600E); atg7(-/-)) to benign oncocytomas that accumulated morphologically and functionally defective mitochondria, suggesting that defects in mitochondrial metabolism may compromise continued tumor growth. Analysis of tumor-derived cell lines (TDCLs) revealed that Atg7-deficient cells are significantly more sensitive to starvation than Atg7-wild-type counterparts, and are impaired in their ability to respire, phenotypes that are rescued by the addition of exogenous glutamine. Taken together, these data suggest that Braf(V600E)-driven tumors become addicted to autophagy as a means to preserve mitochondrial function and glutamine metabolism, and that inhibiting autophagy may be a powerful strategy for Braf(V600E)-driven malignancies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据