4.8 Article

ROS-induced autophagy in cancer cells assists in evasion from determinants of immunogenic cell death

期刊

AUTOPHAGY
卷 9, 期 9, 页码 1292-1307

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.4161/auto.25399

关键词

autophagy; calreticulin; ATP; immunogenic cell death; T cells; cancer; photodynamic therapy (PDT); dendritic cells

资金

  1. Fund for Scientific Research Flanders (FWO-Vlaanderen) [G.0661.09, G.0728.10, G.0584.12N]
  2. KU Leuven [GOA/11/009]
  3. BOF Postdoctoral Mandate (PDM) from KU Leuven [PDMK/12/146]
  4. FWO
  5. Interuniversity Attraction Poles Programme
  6. Belgian State, Science Policy Office
  7. FWO-Vlaanderen [G.0728.10, 31507110]
  8. FWO-Vlaanderen

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Calreticulin surface exposure (ecto-CALR), ATP secretion, maturation of dendritic cells (DCs) and stimulation of T cells are prerequisites for anticancer therapy-induced immunogenic cell death (ICD). Recent evidence suggests that chemotherapy-induced autophagy may positively regulate ICD by favoring ATP secretion. We have recently shown that reactive oxygen species (ROS)-based endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress triggered by hypericin-mediated photodynamic therapy (Hyp-PDT) induces bona fide ICD. However, whether Hyp-PDT-induced autophagy regulates ICD was not explored. Here we showed that, in contrast to expectations, reducing autophagy (by ATG5 knockdown) in cancer cells did not alter ATP secretion after Hyp-PDT. Autophagy-attenuated cancer cells displayed enhanced ecto-CALR induction following Hyp-PDT, which strongly correlated with their inability to clear oxidatively damaged proteins. Furthermore, autophagy-attenuation in Hyp-PDT-treated cancer cells increased their ability to induce DC maturation, IL6 production and proliferation of CD4(+) or CD8(+) T cells, which was accompanied by IFNG production. Thus, our study unravels a role for ROS-induced autophagy in weakening functional interaction between dying cancer cells and the immune system thereby helping in evasion from ICD prerequisites or determinants.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据