4.8 Article

Altered cellular calcium regulatory systems in a rat model of cirrhotic cardiomyopathy

期刊

GASTROENTEROLOGY
卷 121, 期 5, 页码 1209-1218

出版社

W B SAUNDERS CO
DOI: 10.1053/gast.2001.28653

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background & Aims: Decreased cardiac contractility has been observed in cirrhosis, but the cause remains unclear. Because cardiomyocyte contraction depends on Ca2+ influx entering via L-type Ca2+ channels (ICa,LS) to activate Ca2+ release from the sarcoplasmic reticulum, we postulated that the Ca2+ transients may be abnormal in cirrhotic cardiomyocytes. We aimed to investigate the status of the cellular Ca2+-regulatory system in a rat model of cirrhotic cardiomyopathy. Methods: Cirrhosis was induced by bile duct ligation. The I-Ca,I-L protein expression was detected by Western blotting. Ca2+ currents were measured electrophysiologically. The intracellular Ca (2+) system, which includes the ryanodine receptor 2 (RYR2), sarcoplasmic reticulum Ca2+-pump adenosine triphosphatase (SERCA2), and Ca2+-binding protein were quantitatively assayed by reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction and Western blots and functionally by H-3-ryanodine binding and radiolabeled Ca2+ uptake. Results: I-Ca,I-L protein expression was reduced in cirrhotic rats compared with controls, and the peak inward Ca2+ current was significantly less. At all membrane potentials examined, I(Ca,L)s current densities from cirrhotic animals were consistently lower, and the response to maximal isoproterenol stimulation was also significantly lower. Protein expression and messenger RNA transcription for RYR2, SERCA2, and calsequestrin were quantitatively unchanged, and H-3-ryanodine binding characteristics and Ca2+ uptake were also unaltered. Conclusions: We conclude that the decreased cardiac contractility in cirrhotic cardiomyocytes is caused by dysfunction of the Ca2+-regulatory system. Plasma membrane I(Ca,L)s are quantitatively reduced and functionally depressed, whereas intracellular systems are intact.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据