4.8 Article

Immunohistochemical detection of cytoplasmic LC3 puncta in human cancer specimens

期刊

AUTOPHAGY
卷 8, 期 8, 页码 1175-1184

出版社

LANDES BIOSCIENCE
DOI: 10.4161/auto.20353

关键词

autophagosomes; CT26; immunohistochemistry; lysosomes; macroautophagy; MCA205

资金

  1. Ligue Nationale contre le Cancer (Equipes labelisee)
  2. Agence Nationale pour la Recherche (ANR)
  3. European Commission
  4. Fondation pour la Recherche Medicale (FRM)
  5. Institut National du Cancer (INCa)
  6. Canceropole Ile-de-France
  7. Fondation AXA
  8. Fondation Bettencourt-Schueller
  9. LabEx Immuno-Oncology
  10. Ligue Nationale contre le Cancer
  11. Cancer Research UK [15816] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Autophagy is an evolutionarily conserved catabolic process that involves the entrapment of cytoplasmic components within characteristic vesicles for their delivery to and degradation within lysosomes. Alterations in autophagic signaling are found in several human diseases including cancer. Here, we describe a validated immunohistochemical protocol for the detection of LC3 puncta in human formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded cancer specimens that can also be applied to mouse tissues. In response to systemic chemotherapy, autophagy-competent mouse tumors exhibited LC3 puncta, which did not appear in mouse cancers that had been rendered autophagy-deficient by the knockdown of Atg5 or Atg7. As compared with normal tissues, LC3 staining was moderately to highly elevated in the large majority of human cancers studied, albeit tumors of the same histological type tended to be highly heterogeneous in the number and intensity of LC3 puncta per cell. Moreover, tumor-infiltrating immune cells often were highly positive for LC3. Altogether, this protocol for LC3 staining appears suitable for the specific detection of LC3 puncta in human specimens, including tissue microarrays. We surmise that this technique can be employed for retrospective or prospective studies involving large series of human tumor samples.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据