4.7 Article

Diverse chalcone synthase superfamily enzymes from the most primitive vascular plant, Psilotum nudum

期刊

PLANTA
卷 214, 期 1, 页码 75-84

出版社

SPRINGER-VERLAG
DOI: 10.1007/s004250100586

关键词

chalcone synthase (superfamily); phlorisovalerophenone synthase; pinosylvin synthase; Psilotun

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Psilotum nudum Griseb is a pteridophyte and belongs to the single family (Psilotaceae) of the division, Psilophyta. Being the only living species of a once populated division, P. nudum is the most primitive vascular plant. Chalcone synthase (CHS; EC 2.3.1.74) superfamily enzymes are responsible for biosyntheses of diverse secondary metabolites, including flavonoids and stilbenes. Using a reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction strategy, four CHS-superfamily enzymes (PnJ, PnI, PnL and PnP) were cloned from P. nudum, and heterologously expressed in Escherichia coli. These four enzymes of 396-406 amino acids showed sequence identity of > 50% among themselves and to other higher-plant CHS-superfamily enzymes. PnJ and PnP preferred p-coumaroyl-CoA and isovaleryl-CoA, respectively, as starter CoA and catalyzed CHS-type ring formation, indicating that they are CHS and phlorisovalerophenone synthase, respectively. On the other hand, PnI and PnL preferred cinnamoyl-CoA as starter CoA and catalyzed stilbene synthase-type cyclization and thus were determined to be pinosylvin synthases (EC 2.3.1.146). In addition, PnE, which uniquely contains a glutamine in place of otherwise strictly conserved histidine, had no apparent in vitro catalytic activity. Phylogenetic analysis indicated that these P. nudum clones form a separate cluster together with Equisetum arvense CHS. This cluster of pteridophytes is located next to the cluster formed by pine (gymnosperm) enzymes, in agreement with their evolutionary relationships. Psilotum nudum represents a plant with the most diverse CHS-superfamily enzymes and this ability to diverge may have provided a survival edge during evolution.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据