4.6 Article

MRI study of posterior fossa structures and brain ventricles in bipolar patients

期刊

JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRIC RESEARCH
卷 35, 期 6, 页码 313-322

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/S0022-3956(01)00036-X

关键词

bipolar disorder; neuroimaging; cerebellum; vermis; brainstem; ventricles

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Previous brain imaging studies have suggested anatomical abnormalities in posterior fossa structures and brain ventricles in bipolar patients. Such abnormalities could possibly be implicated in the pathophysiology of bipolar disorder. Twenty-two DSM-IV bipolar outpatients (mean age +/- S.D.=36 +/- 10 years) and 22 healthy controls (mean age +/- S.D.=38 +/- 10 years) underwent an 1.5T MRI (3D-gradient echo-imaging SPGR), performed in the coronal plane (TR=25 ms, TE=5 ms, slice thickness =1.5 mm). The brain structures of interest were traced blindly with a semi-automated software. No significant differences were found between bipolar patients and healthy controls for any posterior fossa measures, or for measures of third or lateral ventricles (MANOVA, age covariate, P >0.05). Age was directly correlated with 3rd ventricle volumes in bipolar patients (Pearson correlation coefficient=0.458, P=0.032), but not in healthy controls (Pearson correlation coefficient =0.313, P=0.155). There was a significant direct correlation between the number of prior illness episodes and right lateral ventricle volumes (Partial correlation coefficient =0.658, P=0.011). Familial patients had smaller left and right cerebellar hemispheres and total vermis volumes, and larger left lateral ventricle volumes compared with non-familial ones (MANOVA, age covariate, P <0.05). In this preliminary study, we were not able to replicate previous findings of abnormalities in cerebellum or brain ventricles in bipolar individuals. However, there were suggestions that abnormalities in cerebellum, vermis, and lateral ventricle sizes may be present in familial cases of the disorder, which should be further examined in future studies with larger patient samples. (C) 2001 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据