4.3 Article

A twin study of chronic fatigue

期刊

PSYCHOSOMATIC MEDICINE
卷 63, 期 6, 页码 936-943

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/00006842-200111000-00012

关键词

chronic fatigue; twins; concordance; genetics

资金

  1. NIAID NIH HHS [U19 AI38429] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: The etiology of chronic fatigue syndrome is unknown, but genetic influences may be important in its expression. Our objective was to assess the role of genetic and environmental factors in unexplained chronic fatigue. Methods: A classic twin study was conducted using 146 female-female twin pairs, of whom at least one member reported greater than or equal to6 months of fatigue. After completing questionnaires on symptoms, zygosity, physical health, and a psychiatric interview, twins were classified using three increasingly stringent definitions: 1) chronic fatigue for greater than or equal to6 months, 2) chronic fatigue not explained by exclusionary medical conditions, and 3) idiopathic chronic fatigue not explained by medical or psychiatric exclusionary criteria of the chronic fatigue syndrome case definition. Concordance rates in monozygotic and dizygotic twins were calculated for each fatigue definition along with estimates of the relative magnitude of genetic and environmental influences on chronic fatigue. Results: The concordance rate was higher in monozygotic than dizygotic twins for each definition of chronic fatigue. For idiopathic chronic fatigue, the concordance rates were 55% in monozygotic and 19% in dizygotic twins (p = .042). The estimated heritability in liability was 19% (95% confidence interval = 0-56) for chronic fatigue greater than or equal to6 months, 30% (95% confidence interval 0-81) for chronic fatigue not explained by medical conditions, and 51% (95% confidence interval = 7-96) for idiopathic chronic fatigue. Conclusions: These results provide evidence supporting the familial aggregation of fatigue and suggest that genes may play a role in the etiology of chronic fatigue syndrome.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据