4.5 Article

Influences of perinatal factors on cord blood thyroid-stimulating hormone level

期刊

ACTA OBSTETRICIA ET GYNECOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA
卷 80, 期 11, 页码 1014-1018

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0412.2001.801108.x

关键词

cord blood; perinatal factor; screening; thyroid-stimulating hormone

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background. Cord blood thyroid-stimulating hormone level is affected by various perinatal factors. The aim of this study is to investigate the relative impact of these factors on the cord blood thyroid-stimulating hormone results in singleton pregnancies. Methods. The study group consisted of 20,086 consecutive singleton deliveries over a 3 year period. The effect of mode of delivery, infant sex, gestation at birth, birth weight, and duration of labor on the incidence of false elevation of cord blood thyroid-stimulating hormone was assessed by univariate analysis and logistic regression. Results. There was an independent positive association between false elevation of cord blood thyroid-stimulating hormone (greater than or equal to 15.0 mIU/L) and birth weight (P=0.005), male infant sex (p <0.001), and instrumental delivery (p <0.001). Both elective and emergency cesarean section were negatively associated with elevated cord thyroid-stimulating hormone level (P <0.001). When the cutoff level was raised to 40.0 mIU/L, none of the variables examined were significant. The incidence of false positive tests (greater than or equal to 15.0 mIU/L) was higher in neonates born by cesarean section for failed instrumental delivery and fetal distress than for failure to progress of labor (34.7% vs 4.5% vs 1.3% respectively, p <0.001). Conclusions. While the incidence of false positive screening was significantly affected by various perinatal factors when the thyroid-stimulating hormone cutoff level is low, it was unaffected at a high cutoff level. The present study also provides further evidence that cord blood thyroid-stimulating hormone level reflects fetal response to perinatal stress events.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据