4.8 Article

Th1-polarizing immunization with egg antigens correlates with severe exacerbation of immunopathology and death in schistosome infection

出版社

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.231258498

关键词

-

资金

  1. PHS HHS [R01-18919] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In schistosomiasis mansoni, parasite eggs precipitate an intrahepatic granulomatous and fibrosing inflammatory process, which is mediated by, and dependent on, MHC class II-restricted CD4 T helper (Th) lymphocytes specific for schistosome egg antigens (SEA). In the mouse model of the disease, CBA mice develop large granulomas, whereas in C57BL/6 (BL/6) mice these granulomas are significantly smaller. To further investigate how the prevailing cytokine environment influences the development of the egg-induced immunopathology, we immunized the low-pathology BL/6 mice with SEA in complete Freund's adjuvant (CFA) once before, and once again during, the course of a 7-week infection. This immunization caused a pronounced Thl shift in the SEA-specific CD4 T cell response, which was detected in the mesenteric lymph nodes (MLNs) and spleens, as well as in the granulomatous lesions themselves. The immunized mice displayed a dramatic enhancement of hepatic egg-induced immunopathology manifested by a marked increase in granuloma size and parenchymal inflammation, leading to early death. Control mice immunized with equivalent amounts of SEA or CFA alone displayed the smaller hepatic lesions in a Th2-dominant environment typically seen in the unimmunized BL/6 mice. Analysis of granuloma and MLN lymphocytes from the SEA/CFA-immunized mice revealed that the proportion of CD4 T cells was unchanged in comparison with the control BL/6 groups and remained significantly lower than that seen in the normally high-pathology CBA strain. These results suggest that the shift toward Th1-type cytokine production by a numerically stable population of CD4 T cells correlates with severe exacerbation of immunopathology in schistosomiasis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据