4.7 Review

Possible evidence for a variable fine-structure constant from QSO absorption lines: motivations, analysis and results

期刊

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2001.04840.x

关键词

atomic data; line : profiles; methods : laboratory; techniques : spectroscopic; quasars : absorption lines; ultraviolet : general

向作者/读者索取更多资源

An experimental search for variation in the fundamental coupling constants is strongly motivated by modem high-energy physics theories. Comparison of quasar (QSO) absorption-line spectra with laboratory spectra provides a sensitive probe for variability of the finestructure constant, alpha, over cosmological time-scales. We have previously developed and applied a new method providing an order-of-magnitude gain in precision over previous optical astrophysical constraints. Here we extend that work by including new quasar spectra of damped Lyman-alpha absorption systems. We also reanalyse our previous lower-redshift data and confirm our initial results. The constraints on alpha come from simultaneous fitting of absorption lines of subsets of the following species: Mg I, Mg ii, Al ii, Al iii, Si ii, Cr ii, Fe ii, Ni II and Zn II. We present a detailed description of our methods and results based on an analysis of 49 quasar absorption systems (towards 28 QSOs) covering the redshift range 0.5 < z < 3.5. There is statistical evidence for a smaller alpha at earlier epochs: Delta alpha/alpha = (-0.72 +/- 0.18) x 10(-5). The new and original samples are independent but separately yield consistent and significant non-zero values of Delta alpha/alpha. We summarize the results of a thorough investigation of systematic effects published in a companion paper. The value we quote above is the raw value, not corrected for any of these systematic effects. The only significant systematic effects so far identified, if removed from our data, would lead to a more significant deviation of Delta alpha/alpha from zero.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据