3.8 Article Proceedings Paper

Tissue oxygen tension and brain sensitivity to hypoxia

期刊

RESPIRATION PHYSIOLOGY
卷 128, 期 3, 页码 263-276

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/S0034-5687(01)00306-1

关键词

anoxia; brain; oxygen; consumption; reactive oxygen species

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Mammalian brain is a highly oxidative organ and although it constitutes only a small fraction of total body weight it accounts for a disproportionately large percentage of bodily oxygen consumption (in humans about 2 and 20%, respectively). Yet, the partial pressure and concentration of oxygen in the brain are low and non-uniform. There is a large number of enzymes that use O-2 as a substrate, the most important of which is cytochrome c oxidase, the key to mitochondrial ATP production. The affinity of cytochrome c oxidase for oxygen is very high, which under normal conditions ensures undiminished activity of oxidative phosphorylation down to very low P-O2. By contrast, many other relevant enzymes have K-m values for oxygen within, or above, the ambient cerebral gas tension, thus making their operations very dependent on oxygen level in the physiological range. Among its multiple, versatile functions, oxygen partial pressure and concentration control production of reactive oxygen species, expression of genes and functions of ion channels. Limitation of oxygen supply to the brain below a 'critical' level reduces, and eventually blocks oxidative phosphorylation, drastically decreases cellular (ATP) and leads to a collapse of ion gradients. Neuronal activity ceases and if oxygen is not re-introduced quickly, cells die. The object of this review is to discuss briefly the central oxygen-dependent processes in mammalian brain and the short-term consequences of O-2 deprivation, but not the mechanisms of long-term adaptation to chronic hypoxia. Particular emphasis is-placed on issues which have been the focus of recent attention and/or controversy. (C) 2001 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据