4.5 Article

Fatty-acid-binding proteins do not protect against induced cytotoxicity in a kidney cell model

期刊

BIOCHEMICAL JOURNAL
卷 360, 期 -, 页码 159-165

出版社

PORTLAND PRESS LTD
DOI: 10.1042/0264-6021:3600159

关键词

chemical anoxia; cytoprotection; fatty acid accumulation; ischaemia; Madin-Darby canine kidney cells

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Intracellular accumulation of fatty acids (FAs) is a well-described consequence of renal ischaemia and may lead to lethal cell injury. Fatty-acid-binding proteins (FABPs) are small cytosolic proteins with high affinity for FAs. They may protect vital cellular functions by binding to and promoting the metabolism of FAs, thereby reducing their intracellular concentration. In this study we investigated the putative cytoprotective role of FABPs in a Madin-Darby canine kidney (MDCK) cell model for renal damage. We studied the effects of transfection with cDNA encoding heart FABP, adipocyte FABP or liver FABP on cytotoxicity induced by chemical anoxia or FAs. Transfection of MDCK type II cells with these cDNA types caused a 5-20-fold increase in FABP content, but did not change the rate or extent of palmitate uptake. After I h of incubation with KCN, all cell types showed reduced viability and cellular ATP content and an intracellular accumulation of non-esterified FAs. High extracellular concentrations of oleate, but not palmitate, caused a markedly decreased cell viability and cellular ATP content. Oleate accumulated in non-esterified form in these cells. Simultaneous addition of glucose ameliorated the damaging effects of KCN or oleate, indicating that glycolytic ATP could substitute for uncoupled oxidative phosphorylation. No significant differences in the effects of chemical anoxia or oleate were observed between non-transfected, mock-transfected and FABP-cDNA-transfected cells. Non-esterified FA accumulation was not reduced in any of the FABP-cDNA-transfected cell lines. In conclusion, our data do not provide evidence for a cytoprotective role of FABP in this kidney cell model.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据