4.5 Review

The contribution of molecular biology to the development of vaccines against nematode and trematode parasites of domestic ruminants

期刊

VETERINARY PARASITOLOGY
卷 101, 期 3-4, 页码 311-335

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/S0304-4017(01)00558-1

关键词

molecular biology; nematodes; trematodes; vaccines; recombinant proteins; genomics

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Rapid developments in molecular biology have had an enormous impact on the prospects for the development of vaccines to control the major nematode and trematode infestations of livestock. Vaccine candidates are purified using conventional protein chemistry techniques but the limitations imposed by the scarcity of parasite material provide an insurmountable barrier for commercial vaccine production by this means. The ability to purify mRNA from different parasite life-cycle stages and to prepare cDNA expression libraries from it has proven central to the identification of immunogenic parasite proteins, Potentially, protective parasite antigens can now be produced in recombinant form in a variety of vectors and this represents a key breakthrough on the road to commercial vaccine production. The contribution of molecular biology to this process is discussed using several examples, particularly in vaccine development against the pathogenic abomasal nematode of sheep and goats, Haemonchus contortus, and the liver fluke of sheep and cattle, Fasciola hepatica. The difficulties of producing recombinant proteins in the correct form, with appropriate post-translational modification and conformation, are discussed as well as emerging means of antigen delivery including DNA vaccination. The opportunities offered by genome and expressed sequence tag analyses programmes for antigen targeting are discussed in association with developing microarray and proteomics technologies which offer the prospect of large scale, rapid antigen screening and identification. Crown Copyright (C) 2001 Published by Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据