4.4 Article

Anti-HIV effects of chloroquine: mechanisms of inhibition and spectrum of activity

期刊

AIDS
卷 15, 期 17, 页码 2221-2229

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/00002030-200111230-00002

关键词

gp120; HIV-1 infectivity; HIV-1 subtypes; HIV-2; low-cost medications; Third World

资金

  1. NIAID NIH HHS [R01 AI 45343, P01 AI 44236] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: To investigate the mechanisms and spectrum of the anti-HIV activity of chloroquine. Design and methods: MT-4 cells or peripheral blood mononuclear cells were infected with X4, R5 or R5/X4 HIV-1 strains from clades A-E and HIV-2. The cells were then treated with clinically relevant and achievable chloroquine concentrations (i.e. 0-12.5 muM), so as to determine the EC50. The effects of chloroquine on reverse transcription and integration were tested using a replication-defective reporter HIV-1 construct (pRRL.sin.hPGK.GFP). The effects of the drug on the viral envelope were assessed by syncytium assays and immunoprecipitation, using antibodies to different epitopes of gp120. Results: In de-novo infected MT-4 cells, chloroquine selectively inhibited HIV-1 IIIB replication but not pRRL.sin.hPCK.GFP. In chronically HIV-1-infected H9 11113 cells, chloroquine decreased the infectivity of the newly produced virus and the ability of these cells to form syncytia in co-culture with MT-2 cells. These effects were associated with structural changes in the gp120 glycoprotein, such as a reduction of reactivity with antibodies directed against the glycosylated 2G12 epitope. Although affecting a variable target such as gp120, chloroquine was capable of inhibiting X4, R5 and R5/X4 primary HIV-1 isolates from subtypes A, B, C, D, E and HIV-2. Conclusion: At clinically achievable concentrations chloroquine inhibits HIV-1 post-integrationally by affecting newly produced viral envelope glycoproteins, and the drug has broad-spectrum anti-HIV-1 and HIV-2 activity. (C) 2001 Lippincott Williams Wilkins.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据