4.8 Article

Estrogen-induced vasoprotection is independent of inducible nitric oxide synthase expression - Evidence from the mouse carotid artery ligation model

期刊

CIRCULATION
卷 104, 期 22, 页码 2740-2745

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1161/hc4701.099581

关键词

hormones; vasculature; nitric oxide synthase

资金

  1. NHLBI NIH HHS [HL-57270, HL-64614, HL-07703, HL-07457] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background-Estrogen is vasoprotective in animal models of vascular injury, yet the mechanisms involved are incompletely understood. The role of inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) in vascular repair is controversial, but many lines of evidence indicate that it plays a role in neointima formation after arterial injury and that 17 beta -estradiol (E-2) modulates iNOS expression. This study tested the hypothesis that E-2 reduces neointima formation after vascular injury via a mechanism that is dependent on modulation of iNOS expression. Methods and Results-Male and female wild-type (iNOS(+/+)) mice and mice with homozygous deletion of the iNOS gene (iNOS(-/-)) were studied intact (INT) or after ovariectomy (OVX) and implantation of E-2 or vehicle (V) pellets. Mice were randomized to 8 groups based on sex, iNOS status, OVX, and treatment with E-2 or V. Twenty-eight days after carotid artery ligation, mice were euthanized, and occluded vessels were evaluated for neointima formation by morphometric analysis. There was a marked sexual dimorphism in neointima formation in both the iNOS(+/+) mice and the iNOS(-/-) mice. iNOS(+/+) INT females had a > 90% reduction in neointima formation compared with iNOS(+/+) males, and iNOS(-/-) INT females had a 65% reduction in neointima formation compared with iNOS(-/-) males. The sexually dimorphic response was attenuated by OVX and restored by E-2 replacement in both iNOS(+/+) and iNOS(-/-) mice. Conclusions-These results demonstrate that the vasoprotective effects of E-2 after ligation vascular injury are, at least in part, independent of iNOS expression.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据